Why gibbons v ogden important

Ogden at Legal Information Institute Gibbons v. Ogden at OurDocuments. Ogden ? How did the Court rule? List some ways this ruling affected your life. For example, do you ever buy things that were made in other states? If you had a successful invention and wanted to sell it around the country, would you face different sets of trade requirements in each state? Do you agree with the Court on the meaning of this particular word? Why or why not? What are the advantages of interpreting the Constitution this way?

This section is for students. Use the links below to download classroom-ready. PDFs of case resources and activities. Lopez For Teachers. This section is for teachers. Use the links below to access: student versions of the activities in. PDF and Word formats how to differentiate and adapt the materials how to scaffold the activities how to extend the activities technology suggestions answers to select activities Learn more about Street Law's commitment and approach to quality curriculum.

Available at a high school and middle school levels. Case Background : Background information at three reading levels. Case Vocabulary : Important related vocabulary terms at two reading levels. It was assumed that the licensing act of did this and that the New York law in question was in conflict with it. Thus, the New York law was unconstitutional and New York's injunction against Gibbons was overturned.

Gibbons was free to operate his steamships. Gibbons v. Ogden set the stage for future expansion of congressional power over commercial activity and a vast range of other activities once thought to come within the jurisdiction of the states.

After Gibbons, Congress had preemptive authority over the states to regulate any aspect of commerce crossing state lines. Thus, any state law regulating in-state commercial activities e. Indeed, more than any other case, Ogden set the stage for the federal government's overwhelming growth in power into the 20th century.

Decided in , Gibbons was the first major case in the still-developing jurisprudence regarding the interpretation of congressional power under the Commerce Clause. Aaron Ogden owned a steamboat company that offered commercial service between various ports in New York and New Jersey.

New York state law granted a monopoly on steamboat operations within its waters to a limited number of businessmen, including Ogden, and it fined any operators who violated the restriction. A New York state court granted an injunction against Gibbons, ordering that he cease commercial operation in New York waters. Naturally, Gibbons appealed the case, which was eventually heard by the U. Supreme Court.